 |
Collaboration: advantages and disadvantages
In this help sheet we take you through some of the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with other organisations when mounting an advocacy campaign or a community project.
Advantages
The advantages of collaboration are many:
- In a healthy collaboration there's something in it for both parties, whether it's access to skills and resources or just working towards a common aim.
- You'll have a broader reach, as all the organisations involved in the collaboration will have different networks and mailing lists to spread the word through - which means that more sectors of the community will hear about your campaign.
- You'll gain access to new skills as the various organisations that have these skill sets come on board.
- It's a good opportunity to widen your own networks.
- If more organisations are involved you'll increase your group's own credibility.
- More and more funding bodies like to see collaborations, so this will certainly work in your favour in grant applications - not to mention the fact that a wide range of costs for the campaign could then be shared.
- The other organisations may be able to provide your group with in-kind resources.
- These sorts of collaborations tend to lead to ongoing relationships, which will help you with future campaigns.
Collaborations are generally a good idea, for all the reasons mentioned above. However, there are some circumstances where you at least need to be careful and to put safeguards in place to overcome a few potential problems.
- Collaborations can mean that your campaign moves more slowly, because you need to get consensus or check with the other players regarding every decision - so make sure you have a good understanding of the levels of autonomy that you have.
- You'll be more restricted in what you can do. Certain tactics your group might follow, or positions that your group might ordinarily take, may not be agreed on by other members of your collaboration.
- In-fighting between parties may emerge, and few things could be more damaging to a cause. These squabbles often become public, but even if they don't people in the organisation often finish up acting according to their own micropolitical agendas rather than on the basis of what's good for the campaign.
 |
 |
|